Commit Graph
12 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
flan 1b2407f6e2 compat: dedup the bug report deterministically (lowest issue number wins)
CI / shell (shellcheck + syntax) (push) Successful in 10s
CI / python 3.11 (push) Successful in 16s
CI / python 3.12 (push) Successful in 18s
CI / python 3.13 (push) Successful in 18s
TrueNAS compatibility / compat (push) Successful in 10s
Two issues with the same title already existed -- the old title embedded the list of
broken refs, so the issue's identity changed whenever that set changed. With an
order-dependent pick the bot would alternate between them, reopening one and
commenting on the other. Lowest number is stable regardless of how the API sorts.
2026-07-13 19:08:27 +00:00
flan ab0b66c47d compat: the bug-report title must be stable across ref-set changes
CI / shell (shellcheck + syntax) (push) Successful in 10s
CI / python 3.11 (push) Successful in 15s
CI / python 3.12 (push) Successful in 17s
CI / python 3.13 (push) Successful in 18s
TrueNAS compatibility / compat (push) Successful in 10s
The title embedded the list of broken refs, so the issue's identity changed whenever
that set changed -- and it did: when the async/sync port briefly made 26 look green,
the next run filed a SECOND issue for 'master' alone. A bot that spawns duplicates
gets muted, and then it is not a warning system any more.

The title is now fixed; the refs live in the body, which gets updated in place.
2026-07-13 19:02:57 +00:00
flan 8c1b4c45f5 release: rc notes resolve to the base version; publish without jq
CI / shell (shellcheck + syntax) (push) Successful in 14s
CI / python 3.11 (push) Successful in 17s
CI / python 3.12 (push) Successful in 20s
CI / python 3.13 (push) Successful in 21s
TrueNAS compatibility / compat (push) Successful in 10s
Release / release (push) Successful in 14s
release_notes.py 'notes v0.6.0-rc1' looked for a CHANGELOG section literally named
v0.6.0-rc1. check() already used base_version(); extract_notes() did not. So the
release workflow cut the tag, passed every gate, and then died extracting the body --
the candidate existed but was never published.

Caught in an rc, which is the entire point of having them.

Also: the Gitea publish and issue steps used jq, which is not guaranteed on a
self-hosted runner. A publish step that dies on a missing tool leaves a tag with no
release behind it, and a bug report that dies on one is a warning system that does
not warn. Both now use python3, which setup-python guarantees.
2026-07-13 18:38:02 +00:00
flan ea090c7f72 Audit fixes: a compat verdict must never be able to brick a working box
CI / shell (shellcheck + syntax) (push) Successful in 8s
CI / python 3.11 (push) Successful in 12s
CI / python 3.12 (push) Successful in 14s
CI / python 3.13 (push) Successful in 13s
TrueNAS compatibility / compat (push) Successful in 38s
The audit found the new machinery could do more harm than the bugs it prevents.

- apply.sh reused the 'nothing left to do' exit -- which touches the PERMANENT
  kill switch, cleared only by install.sh, never by update.sh -- for the
  incompatible case. On TrueNAS 26 (providers ok, nested opt-out) both modules go
  quiet, so the switch would fire and the release that fixed 26 could never
  re-enable itself. Retirement and incompatibility now take different exits.
- A network blip, a re-export, or a conditional def all read as BROKEN. Each is
  now 'unknown', which changes nothing, rather than evidence strong enough to
  disable a module.
- 'native' outranked BROKEN everywhere but apply.sh, so a TrueNAS that reworded
  the guard AND reshaped the functions rendered as good news.
- compat.py --tree read B2_BLOCK's own 'restic = True' as native support, so the
  documented way to check a live box lied on every patched machine.
- The signature check was a name-subset test. It passed reorders, kw-only
  conversions, and added required params -- and it had already passed a real bug:
  restic_backup takes 4 args on 24.10/25.04, and the wrapper forwarded 5. Nested
  backups have been raising TypeError on those releases the whole time. The
  wrapper now forwards *args/**kwargs.
- release.sh --promote was unreachable: it died if the tag existed, the gate died
  if it did not. The tests hid it by always tagging first.
2026-07-13 17:58:15 +00:00
flan f927773f81 docs: TrueNAS compatibility matrix and the two-stage release process
CI / shell (shellcheck + syntax) (push) Successful in 10s
CI / python 3.11 (push) Successful in 13s
CI / python 3.12 (push) Successful in 13s
TrueNAS compatibility / compat (push) Successful in 11s
CI / python 3.13 (push) Successful in 14s
The matrix is regenerated daily by CI rather than typed once and forgotten — a
support table that quietly goes stale is a false promise to someone deciding
whether to trust this with their backups.
2026-07-13 17:35:03 +00:00
flan cd39489c7f compat/release: stop interpolating ${{ }} into run: bodies
CI / shell (shellcheck + syntax) (push) Successful in 8s
CI / python 3.11 (push) Successful in 13s
CI / python 3.12 (push) Successful in 15s
CI / python 3.13 (push) Successful in 15s
TrueNAS compatibility / compat (push) Successful in 9s
The report body is full of backticks, so 'echo "${{ steps.report.outputs.body }}"'
pasted it into the shell text and bash executed create-snapshot, def and async as
commands. The report is built from iX's middleware source, so that was an injection
vector as well as a bug. inputs.tag on workflow_dispatch had the same shape.

Data goes through files, scalars through env:. Tests enforce it across every
workflow.
2026-07-13 17:30:50 +00:00
flan 5cbb7def6f Compatibility watch: check the patch's assumptions against every TrueNAS release line
CI / shell (shellcheck + syntax) (push) Failing after 5s
TrueNAS compatibility / compat (push) Failing after 1m6s
CI / python 3.13 (push) Failing after 1m11s
CI / python 3.11 (push) Successful in 1m28s
CI / python 3.12 (push) Successful in 1m29s
TrueNAS 26 rewrites cloud_backup from async to sync. Every block the nested
module injects is an async wrapper around an awaited original, so on 26 it hands
sync.py a coroutine where it unpacks a tuple.

tools/compat.py records what each module assumes and checks it two ways: CI runs
it against iX's source at every release line (including master and the current
BETA) and files a bug report when an unreleased line breaks; apply.sh runs it
against the middlewared actually installed and refuses to apply a module whose
assumptions no longer hold. Stock TrueNAS without a feature beats TrueNAS with a
broken one.

Workflows run on both forges; only the release/issue API calls differ.
2026-07-13 17:25:37 +00:00
flan 4ced730d65 Make Gitea canonical; derive the changelog URL from the remote instead of hard-coding GitHub 2026-07-13 17:21:30 +00:00
flan ba533dc8ae v0.3.1: automated releases + version-drift check
The "Automated releases" entry was written under v0.3.0, but that commit landed
after the v0.3.0 tag -- the CHANGELOG was claiming the release contained something
it did not. Moved to its own version rather than left as a quiet inaccuracy.

Bumps VERSION to 0.3.1 across all four scripts, which the new consistency check
now enforces.
2026-07-13 15:07:29 +00:00
flan eb91a337cd Automate releases from tags
Releases were manual and had drifted: v0.2.0 and v0.2.1 were tagged but never
released, so the releases page jumped v0.1.0 -> v0.3.0 and hid the fix for the
incident that took every app down.

Pushing a v* tag now runs the full suite and cuts a GitHub release whose body is
the matching CHANGELOG.md section -- one source of truth for release notes, so
there is no second place for them to be wrong.

The workflow refuses to publish when:
  - the tests, ruff, or bash -n fail (a tagged commit is what people install; it
    must be at least as good as main)
  - the tag does not match the VERSION= declared by every script
  - CHANGELOG.md has no section for the tag, or the section is empty

That version check is not theoretical: VERSION= had drifted to three different
values across install.sh / uninstall.sh / recover.sh / apply.sh and nothing
noticed until this release. tests/test_release_notes.py now asserts the scripts
agree with each other and with the newest CHANGELOG entry, so the drift cannot
come back.

workflow_dispatch takes an existing tag, so releases can be backfilled for tags
that were pushed before this existed.

106 tests, ruff and shellcheck clean.
2026-07-13 15:05:46 +00:00
flan bb26edf351 Make nested snapshots opt-in; fix snapshot leaks found in audit
Opt-in
------
Nested-dataset snapshot support changes how backups read their source data, so
it is now off by default and gated behind a marker file:

  install.sh --enable-nested-snapshots
  install.sh --disable-nested-snapshots

With neither flag install.sh preserves the current setting, so a routine
`git pull && bash install.sh` can never silently flip it. When disabled,
apply.sh skips the patch entirely and the stock guard remains. uninstall.sh
tears down staging mounts and removes the marker.

Snapshot lifecycle
------------------
zfs.snapshot.delete defaults to recursive=False and stock restic_backup() calls
it with no options. Stock is safe only because its validation means recursive is
never True in the field. Enabling nested datasets makes recursive snapshots real:
the parent then has one child snapshot per descendant dataset (160+ on an Apps
pool), so stock's delete would orphan every child on EVERY successful run.

The patch now owns the lifecycle end to end:

- delete_snapshot_tree() sweeps the parent and all children, and is idempotent
  against stock's finally winning the race once our mounts are released
- on a staging failure the tree is deleted here, because sync.py never completes
  `snapshot, local_path = await create_snapshot(...)` and so its finally deletes
  nothing at all
- the snapshot is recorded in a sidecar file before anything is mounted, so a
  middlewared restart mid-backup cannot orphan it
- a crashed run's snapshot tree is reclaimed on the next run instead of being
  overwritten and leaked

Silent-omission fix
-------------------
The dataset list is now enumerated AFTER the snapshot. Read beforehand it could
miss a dataset created in the gap, which the recursive snapshot would capture but
the staging plan would not -- silently omitting its data. Read afterwards, an
unsnapshotted dataset trips the staging check and fails the run loudly.

Also from the audit
-------------------
- plan_staging scopes by dataset name, so skipped-dataset warnings no longer
  include every mountpoint-less dataset on the box, which buried the ones that
  matter
- staging_root_for rejects "." / ".." components that would escape the staging
  base, and resolves STAGING_BASE at call time rather than freezing it into a
  default argument
- uninstall.sh no longer `rm -rf`s a tree that may still contain live bind
  mounts, and unmounts by path depth rather than string length
- apply_plan takes an injectable isdir; verify_staged drops an unused parameter
- pin the shellcheck action instead of tracking @master

61 tests, ruff and shellcheck clean.
2026-07-12 21:52:09 +00:00
flan a572eb2164 Support ZFS snapshots on datasets with child datasets
TrueCloud Backup's "Take Snapshot" option is rejected on any path containing
child datasets:

  This option is only available for datasets that have no further nesting

That excludes every pool running Apps, where each app is its own dataset and
often has config/pgdata children. Without the option the backup reads live
files, so databases are captured mid-write and an app that continuously
rewrites its files can stall a run as restic chases a moving target.

The stock guard is correct and must not simply be removed. create_snapshot()
already takes a recursive ZFS snapshot, but points the backup tool at the
parent dataset's .zfs/snapshot/, and ZFS does not expose child datasets there:

  /mnt/Tap/.zfs/snapshot/<snap>/apps/                -> 0 entries
  /mnt/Tap/apps/lidarr/config/.zfs/snapshot/<snap>/  -> the real data

Deleting the check would make restic walk a near-empty tree, report success,
and upload almost nothing.

Implement the missing traversal instead. After the recursive snapshot is taken,
each descendant dataset's own .zfs/snapshot/<snap> is bind-mounted into a
staging tree mirroring the original layout, and the backup tool is pointed at
the staging root. The guard is relaxed only after that machinery is in place.

Safety properties:
- staging failure aborts the backup; a partial tree is never handed to restic
- a post-mount pass asserts every target is a mountpoint and the root is
  non-empty, so this cannot regress into the empty backup it exists to prevent
- apply.sh patches crud.py last, so a partial failure leaves the guard intact
  rather than exposing "guard removed, traversal missing"
- every injected block no-ops when _truecloud_nested is absent
- unmountable/locked datasets are skipped and reported, never dropped silently
- scoped to cloud_backup; cloudsync has no teardown wired in, so its guard stays

The staging root is stable per task, so restic can find its parent snapshot
between runs; stock's timestamped .zfs path changes every run and forces a
full re-scan.

Add CI (shellcheck, bash -n, ruff, pytest on 3.11-3.13), including tests that
compile the *_BLOCK strings, which are Python source appended to live
middlewared modules and were previously unchecked.

Also: sync stale version strings, untrack a committed .pyc, gitignore
__pycache__.
2026-07-12 21:20:22 +00:00