feat: Rename the card to advanced-camera-card (#1873)

Whilst the Frigate support in this card is the best among camera
engines, the name incorrectly suggests that Frigate is a requirement.
Instead, to broaden the appeal, change to more camera agnostic name.
This does not suggest any change in priority, role or support for
Frigate.

This change is likely to be bug prone, due to the size of the rename --
the code contains 1500+ references to "Frigate" most of which make sense
to rename, some which do not, all of which needed human assessment.

- Closes #1298


BREAKING CHANGE: References to `frigate-card` in all kinds of
configuration need to be updated to `advanced-camera-card`. An automated
config upgrade should take care of the majority of usecases (click `Edit
-> Upgrade -> Save`), though may not be perfect.

docs/support.md

@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ incrementally improve, and I think time is better spent working on reproducible
 issues or new features, than guessing what versions/options you are using. The
 new issue template asks for the minimum possible information to support you:
 
-- **Diagnostics**: On the card, hold down the Default/Frigate menu button for a
+- **Diagnostics**: On the card, hold down the Iris (default) menu button for a
   few seconds then paste the diagnostics into the issue between the backticks.
 - **Description of the problem**: I need to understand the issue in sufficient
   detail.
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ fixes should be provided, or new features developed, is misunderstanding the
 fundamental dynamics of open source. I am sorry you feel this way, but open
 source software (including this card) is typically provided "as-is". Take it or
 leave it. If you want things to go faster / differently, [please
-contribute](https://github.com/dermotduffy/frigate-hass-card/issues/1248). If
+contribute](https://github.com/dermotduffy/advanced-camera-card/issues/1248). If
 you don't want to contribute to the shared codebase, fork it and make your own.
 Or pay for a (different) Enterprise grade solution to your problem. This is
 certainly not that -- a card, developed in hobbiest-level time, with